23 ARE NATURAL LAWS INFINITE? I

23 ARE NATURAL LAWS INFINITE? I

A trillion of trillions of years before …
One of the first things that Herakón determined these days of chaos, was a high virtual meeting. I humanize nothing it(he,she) would take part directly in this debate. Some of them as Herakón were taking part across a system that was synthesizing the opinions of the population of Thaumasios. Also anonymous some of them could intervene, though before his(her,your) contributions were evaluated and condensed by systems of artificial logic.
The mission: to take at least a level beyond(farther,further), the whole goal - philosophy (Evolution and merger of the former ones, science and philosophy.) in vogue. The levels known about the nature were explaining always for the previous ones: the biology was explaining for the chemistry, this one for the physics, this one for the science of the particles and the fields, and these for more fundamental trans-physical others and so on for several levels more. Then, one was starting already entering the areas of the goal - philosophy that he(she) was studying to the same being. But the goal - philosophy was not speculative and was universal. Of a new progress be doing it might have a new technology, only like that there might be hopes of an exit to the final problem. Pero Herakón was trusting that he(she) would not be.
The urgency of removing the bases themselves of the standard metafilosofía, to go deeper, was to achieve a new technology. Capable of what the current one could not: to save the human life especially and the life itself in general. Later part(report) of the debate moves to the human language.
The first problem that we will approach is: are the laws of the nature finite or infinite? - he(she) said across a few pulses of very low frequency the MG - that was a series of expert systems that had been constructed about the database of the molecule germinal.
Are - added Herakón - dug and understood(included) hundreds of levels of the nature, since there excelled themselves the science and the archaic philosophy (in the revolution epistemológica of the goal - philosophy). But still(yet) we have not come to the bottom(fund). There are no evidences of which we approach the last level, if it is. One after other one the revolutions have happened epistemológicas, the last one 300 years ago without never coming to the fundamental structure of the nature. This abyss to the one that appears the science has it(he,she) bottom(fund)? There is an atom an indivisible and final unit of the royal(real) thing?
- probably the final entity, without parts(reports) nor structure, the atom, exists - said anonymous L to slant the logical híper of the central system of artificial intelligence (HLSCIA), the nomenclature of his(her,your) rare(strange) dialect was issued(emitted) in a few electrical pops - probably we should have dug towards the smallest thing, but to the biggest thing, the entity without parts(reports) nor structure, the atom might be everything, the most general epiphenomenon of which we go away alejando. - he(she) concluded - we contradict Ourselves when we consider to the universe ontológicamente one, but epistemológicamente diversely.
On the equipments(teams) and conduits a rare(strange) Theknos was stretching amorphous and linearly, this linear thing was moving for the whole ship across thin fissures and was a mixture(mixing) of parts(reports) of the mind of the Hekantokeinos. After an own(proper) internal discussion, it(he,she) contributed his(her,your) own(proper) approach:
- if there were finite the laws of the nature and his(her,your) levels of complexity will goal - philosophy be able to describe this last level? Or will atom prevent that it could think about him(it), for being previous he(it) itself on having thought and foundation of this one?
A line organisation that was moving as a floating mass of luminous filaments intervened:
- in the beginning everything was a chaos and nothing was understandable to the conscience. The different levels of the nature (cosmic, social, biological, chemist, physicist, subatomic) were not observed related between(among) yes. Later the proto-metafilosofía (The science.) it(he,she) started connecting some to others. This task has not ended still(yet). But it(he,she) does not matter if it(he,she) has end(purpose) or not this way, a trip to a lower alone level might be useful. Probably let's find a technology to solve the death of the universe.
- probably yes - added Herakón - or probably not.
- comprehension is a compression, - he(she) added anonymous L by means of the logical useless device - the goal - philosophy looks for laws mas simple to explain the most complex thing and fewer laws to explain increasingly phenomena.