25 ARE NATURAL LAWS INFINITE? II

25 ARE NATURAL LAWS INFINITE? II

A trillion of trillions of years before …
Herakón spoke:
- We start by imagining both possibilities:
A. - The natural laws are infinite
B. - the natural laws are finite
A. - if the natural laws are infinite always there will be an infinite number of phenomena that we will be able neither to explain nor to understand(include) The universe being finite in magnitude might it(he) be infinite in complexity?
Invisible L had an intuition suddenly and they added:
- we think that the number of levels of the nature is finite because:
1.-No infinites have been observed in the nature.
2.-If the laws diminish to the lowest levels, in an infinite progression there is no a lower level. There would no be a reason for the natural phenomena and without reason there are no effects.
3.-The complexity and diversity increase in the nature lie more we move away from the basic laws. If there is an infinite series at the time the complexity of the phenomena would be infinite. A phenomenon of infinite complexity would be uncompressible. Since the comprehension is possible?
The natural laws are finite
Then the number of inexplicable or incomprehensible phenomena will be increasingly limited(small), until finally everything is explicable. If it(he) is finite the number of the levels of the reality (social, biological, chemical physical, atomic, subatomic level etc) will end in a certain number and there should be a few fundamental and uncompromising laws.
-Herakón intervened to refute it:
- the number of strata that we will have to dig up up to coming to this basic level can be any number between(among) one and immensely. A number at random between(among) these two ends is practically infinite.
If we imagine an enormous number (for example 10000000000000 the probability of which the number of levels of the nature is a major number is infinitely major of that he is one minor. So it(he,she) will be major. For what seems that still(yet) being finite this number of levels, it(he,she) tends to infinite.
- anyhow all manners to go on to a deeper level of comprehension of the nature would explain some things that now we do not understand(include).
He(She) added something:
- it might be possible that the nature is unthinkable in certain levels of depth. To think the nature is a requirement to advance and if only it it is a section, it will be impossible to know if we come to the end(purpose). We might already be caught in a natural level that makes us unable to think others.
- How many theories and hypothesis is in the database? - they asked to the unison all.
- approximately 14 632 theories, we will test and buckle the most commendable of analyzing epistemológicamente.
They began tidily for the first one of them: the theory of the goal - dimensionalidad of the technician L, who had managed to do the prediction of the disappearance of the animals puts dimensional …

This way they continued at breakneck speed and threw themselves without hesitations to the abyss epistémico fully of uncertainty and emptily, falling down in him(it). They were possessing(relying on) only conjectures and logic, they explored bravely these regions without form or modals that it is the unknown thing, the impossible thing to deal. Pawned in coming at least slightly beyond(farther,further) and of stealing something of comprehension to the enormous and ambiguous shade that it(he,she) begins mas there of the known thing. If it(he,she) had been in human terms(ends) this intellectual adventure would have taken thousands of years.
But, the whole discussion, and not only the fragment here registered, lasted approximately 0.7 microseconds.